Friday, November 6, 2015

OJ Pimpson

This case has many thing amuses me sensing how many things went wrong and OJ was still found innocent. First off, I believe that Mark Fuhrman is a bigot, and had no place in this case. Right off the bat you could tell he was going after OJ simply based off of his race. Fuhrman had claimed that he saw blood in OJ's vehicle, at his estate, and all around the inside of his household. Simpson's defense team claimed that Fuhrman had planted the glove at Simpson's estate. Yes I believe OJ did it, but my question is why did Mark Fuhrman go to such extremes to try to prove OJ was guilty? In my opinion, if Fuhrman never got involved, I believe OJ would've been found guilty right off the bat because of all the other evidence.

5 comments:

  1. What I found weird was the evidence in which they left out. They left out the high speed car chase and the amount of money found is his car.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What I found weird was the evidence in which they left out. They left out the high speed car chase and the amount of money found is his car.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I believe that Fuhrman should have been found guilty for lying on the stand when asked about being a racist and saying racist remarks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with you Chad, I also found Fuhrman to be going for OJ based on his race. I also believe that this case would have gone way differently if people didn't hate the LAPD at the time and the juror was structured a little differently.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with you Chad, I also found Fuhrman to be going for OJ based on his race. I also believe that this case would have gone way differently if people didn't hate the LAPD at the time and the juror was structured a little differently.

    ReplyDelete