Friday, November 6, 2015

Still dont know how I feel about OJ with no pulp

I think that there are only two things in this whole case that made me believe that he was guilty. One was all the blood and DNA found on the scene and the fact that it was clearly OJ's, 1 in 6.7 billion. The other thing that made me believe OJ was guilty was how he was in a cop chase and was found with a gun, mask, money and blood in his white bronco. And the fact he said "I'm the one that deserves to get hurt" made him sound self incriminating. At the same time I don't want to believe that he was guilty because there was too much room for mistakes which did happen on the LAPD's half as well as how Fuhrman came off and how he presented himself. Also I found it suspicious that Vannatter drove off with the blood for a few hours with no supervision.

4 comments:

  1. I agree! If I was part of the jury I would have had a really hard time conviction OJ because there is some evidence that makes me question the morals and ethics of the police. They knew better than to drive around with OJ's blood in the car, Fuhrman knew better than to lie to the entire court room, the forensics team should have known better than to allow a trainee to test the blood on the car. While watching this it makes it really hard for me to think OJ is guilty when most of the evidence seemed to be planted by the police.

    ReplyDelete

  2. I totally agree with you. If they had collected data correctly, they would've been successful prosecuting OJ as guilty. Its disturbing how it was obvious he committed the crime, but the evidence was not legitimate to prove the conclusions of what happened. sucks.

    ReplyDelete

  3. I totally agree with you. If they had collected data correctly, they would've been successful prosecuting OJ as guilty. Its disturbing how it was obvious he committed the crime, but the evidence was not legitimate to prove the conclusions of what happened. sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I (also) agree! This case frustrated me because at first, I wanted to be on O.J.'s side, but as they discussed the crime scene, I thought he was definitely guilty.
    Then as time went on, I could not believe how badly the police ruined this case. If I were a juror, I would feel obligated to not convict O.J. as guilty, because there was more than enough reasonable doubt.
    I believe someone in the documentary said "they tried to frame a guilty man" and I think that is spot on, if the police hadn't been sketchy, I firmly believe that the trial would have had a different outcome.

    ReplyDelete